1、回复需要完整全面。2、回复需要完整全面。3、回复审稿意见要有理有据。不论你前面的表现如何，期刊接受率都会根据你如何回覆这些评审意见来决定。谢悟空邀请，一句话，SCI修回，照着修回的意见一条一条的修改完善就是了，这问题问的简单直白、呆萌。
如何处理SCI审稿人意见？篇1
当回复不是单纯拒稿时，大部分都会再加上审稿意见希望作者澄清与内文修正。审稿意见来自期刊编辑与评审，一般正面的审稿意见有两种形式:1.期刊对你的论文感到兴趣，而且评审希望你做些增删来优化论文，收到这样的信就代表你已经离发表不远了。2.你可能收到一封拒稿的信但里面却写着期刊会重新审核论文如果论文有重新做实质上的修改，包括增加新的数据。
用棒球来做比喻的话，就是成功击出并上了一垒但还不能上二垒，这时候你可以修改你的论文并进行追加实验来满足期刊要求。不论你前面的表现如何，期刊接受率都会根据你如何回覆这些评审意见来决定。 当你回信时，要谨记几点：以下是几个可以帮助你在回信时解说你如何修改论文的句型开头Thank you for providing these insights.Thank you for your suggestion.That is an interesting query.This is an interesting perspective.We agree with you.We agree with your assessment.You have raised an important question.You have asked an interesting question.同意审稿或期刊编辑意见We agree with you and have incorporated this suggestion throughout our paper.We have reflected this comment by… (p. #, lines #-#).We have incorporated your comments by… (p. #, lines #-#).We agree that…We have now [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and [Y] (p. #, lines #-#). We think these changes now better [Z]. We hope that you agree.不同意评审或期刊编辑意见You have raised an important point; however, we believe that [X] would be outside the scope of our paper because…This is a valid assessment of…; however, we believe that [X] would be more appropriate because…We agree that…; however, due to [X], we believe that…In our revisions, we have attempted to [X] (p. #, lines #-#); however, we have retained some of our arguments because…We acknowledge that [X] has certain limitations; however,…解释澄清We have clarified that… means… (p. #, lines #-#) throughout the paper.We have redrafted the [X] p (p. #, lines #-#) to establish a clearer focus.We have revised the text (p. #, lines #-#) to reflect…We removed [X] (from p. #, lines #-#) and hope that the deletion clarifies the points we attempted to make.We have replaced the term [X] throughout the paper with [Y] to use more precise terms.We have rewritten [X] (p. #, lines #-#) to be more in line with your comments. We hope that the edited p clarifies…We have elaborated on [X] (p. #, lines #-#) and expanded our consideration of [Y]. We hope these revisions provide a more [balanced][thorough] discussion.额外的信息与解释We have included a new Figure # (p. #) to further illustrate…We have added a new Table # (p. #), which outlines…We have supplemented the [X] p with explanations of [Y] (p. #, lines #-#).There are multiple reasons/approaches to…, including [our scenario]. We have included an acknowledgment regarding this point in the [X] p (p. #, lines #-#).We have not done… However, we believe that [doing X] (p. #, lines #-#) would address this issue because…We have not done…; however, our sense is that…回答多题 (当你的一个回复回答许多问题时)Please see point # above. [e.g., "Please see point 2(a) above."] 。
如何处理SCI论文修回？篇2
谢悟空邀请，一句话，SCI修回，照着修回的意见一条一条的修改完善就是了，这问题问的简单直白、呆萌。投稿的主体，不管是科研人员还是普通民众，与编辑和评审专家的关系就是小媳妇与公婆的关系，更透彻一点就是公婆在替儿子考察这女孩够不够格成为儿媳妇！会投某一个期刊，说明被接收就是你的最终目标，那么只要有可能，你就得全力以赴。
投稿子尤其是科研稿是一个极度磨人的过程，99.9%的情况都会经历返修或直接拒稿，直接接收的情况极少，但也有，我就经历过如此幸福做梦般一次！最爱投英国皇家化学会期刊期刊，严谨高效现在的问题是修回，说明期刊编辑没有完全放弃你，那么只要点对点的修改，该补充的实验补充好，补不出来就好好的解释。评审指出有疑问的地方，点对点的解释清楚，最好带文献作为支撑证据。
sci论文修改意见如何回复？篇3
1、回复需要完整全面。审稿人对你SCI文章提出的每一条意见或者建议都是合理的，大家需要逐条作出回应，千万不要遗漏了审稿人的问题或建议。这样才能让审稿人觉得他的意见被你重视了，你的态度是认真诚恳的，这对于成功投稿也是很有帮助的。 2、回复需要完整全面。审稿人对你SCI文章提出的每一条意见或者建议都是合理的，大家需要逐条作出回应，千万不要遗漏了审稿人的问题或建议。
这样才能让审稿人觉得他的意见被你重视了，你的态度是认真诚恳的，这对于成功投稿也是很有帮助的。 3、回复审稿意见还要有理有据。在回答审稿人的问题时，要做到有理有据，这样才能说服审稿人。https://www.scipaper.net/scixiugai/ 4、不要跟审稿人发生争执。跟审稿人起争执是非常不明智的一件事情。